Hoppa till huvudinnehåll

Job Evaluation – Calibration Record

This article explains the job evaluation calibration record, describing how factor definitions, level descriptions, and cross-departmental examples are used to align and validate job evaluation outcomes.

L
Skrivet av Linnéa Molin
Uppdaterad igår

A Framework for Ensuring Consistency and Accuracy in Job Evaluation

The Job Evaluation – Calibration Record is a structured tool designed to support organizations in assessing and calibrating job evaluation outcomes across different departments and business units. It ensures that factor scoring is applied consistently, transparently, and in line with the organization’s job architecture methodology.

The spreadsheet is organized into multiple factor-specific tabs—including Education, Experience, Social Skills, Cognitive Skills, Impact, Leadership, Responsibility for People, Responsibility for Resources, Physical Working Conditions, and Psychological Working Conditions. Each tab provides factor definitions, level descriptions, and fields for calibration inputs from different departments.


1. Purpose of the Calibration Record

The calibration record enables organizations to:

  • Ensure consistency in how job evaluation factors are interpreted and applied.

  • Compare and align scoring across teams, departments, and functions.

  • Document rationale and examples supporting the selected factor level.

  • Standardize the evaluation process with a clear reference tool for HR, managers, and evaluators.

  • Support fairness and equity, reducing subjectivity in job evaluation.

By structuring this information in a single file, the organization maintains traceability and strengthens the integrity of job evaluation decisions.


2. Structure of the Calibration Tool

Each tab represents one evaluation factor. At the top of each tab—illustrated in the Education sheet—you find three core components:

1. Factor Definition

A written explanation of what the factor measures.
For example, the Education tab states that the factor assesses the theoretical knowledge required to perform a role, evaluated based on the level of education typically needed—not the individual’s actual education.

2. Level Descriptions

A vertical list of levels defining increasing requirements.
In the Education tab, these levels cover:

  1. Brief instruction

  2. Short on-the-job learning (Elementary level)

  3. Structured training or specific courses

  4. Upper secondary education

  5. Vocational college or equivalent

  6. Bachelor's degree

  7. Master’s degree

  8. Doctoral or licentiate level

These descriptions provide the benchmark for evaluators.

3. Calibration Columns for Departments

To the right of the level descriptions, the sheet includes blank columns for:

  • Company Description – what is typical at this level within the department

  • Sample Titles – jobs that exemplify this level

These fields allow departments to contextualize the factor levels with actual organizational examples.


3. How the Calibration Process Works

The calibration tool supports a structured multi-step process:

Step 1 – Independent Evaluation

HR and evaluators first assess jobs using the factor model.

Step 2 – Departmental Input

Each department fills in:

  • What the factor level looks like in their context

  • Example roles representing each level

This anchors the theoretical model in real-world job data.

Step 3 – Cross-Functional Calibration

HR compares entries across departments to identify:

  • Misalignment

  • Inconsistent interpretations

  • Outlier evaluations

  • Differences in perceived complexity or requirements

Step 4 – Consolidation and Approval

Final decisions on level interpretation, examples, and descriptions are made collaboratively and documented in the record.

Step 5 – Ongoing Maintenance

The calibration record is updated:

  • When new roles are added

  • When organizational needs shift

  • During regular job architecture governance reviews

This ensures long-term stability and fairness.


4. Benefits of Using a Calibration Record

Using this structured approach provides significant advantages:

  • Improves equity by reducing subjective variation

  • Enhances transparency through clear documentation

  • Supports job architecture integrity by keeping evaluations aligned

  • Strengthens communication between HR and business stakeholders

  • Helps avoid grade inflation or inconsistencies

  • Provides a reference library of factor interpretations and role examples

It becomes a living document supporting both compensation strategy and organizational design.


5. Summary

The Job Evaluation – Calibration Record is a foundational tool used to ensure accurate, fair, and consistent application of job evaluation factors. It combines clear definitions, structured level descriptions, and department-specific examples to create an evidence-based calibration process. Through this tool, organizations maintain alignment across roles, departments, and functions—strengthening transparency, equity, and long-term governance of their job architecture.

Fick du svar på din fråga?